Modelling Liquefied Petroleum Gas Prices in Nigeria Using Time Series Machine Learning Models
Tayo P Ogundunmade1*, Adedayo A Adepoju1
1Department of Statistics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
*Correspondence to: Tayo P Ogundunmade, Masters, Teaching Assistant, Department of Statistics, University of Ibadan, Oduduwa Road, Ibadan, Oyo, 200132, Nigeria; Email: ogundunmadetayo@yahoo.com
DOI: 10.53964/mem.2022005
Abstract
Background: The usage of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in households has been increasing in recent years. The energy consumption by households is difficult to forecast due to the nature of the independent variables. Deep learning models has been broadly utilized in the machine learning area to model time series data, most notably in the area of forecasting.
Objective: This study was to determine the best model for LPG price prediction in Nigeria.
Methods: In this work, the neural network autoregressive (NNETAR) model, naive forecasting, and the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models were used to model the price of LPG prices in 37 states (including the Federal Capital Territory) of Nigeria, with input variables in the form of the price of refilling LPG for 12.5kg from January 2016 to April 2019 covering a 1480 data points. The mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) were used to evaluate the performance of the model.
Results: The present study suggested that Adamawa has the lowest price of 12.5kg refilling LPG from January 2016 to April 2019 in the North East with a price of 2126.879 naira, FCT has the lowest price of 12.5kg refilling LPG from January 2016 to April 2019 in the North Central with a price of 2003.056 naira, Kaduna has the lowest price of 12.5kg refilling LPG from January 2016 to April 2019 in the North West with a price of 2006.436 naira, Edo has the lowest price of 12.5kg refilling LPG from January 2016 to April 2019 in the South South with a price of 2092.955 naira, Ebonyi has the lowest price of 12.5kg refilling LPG from January 2016 to April 2019 in the South East with a price of 2033.262 naira and Ekiti has the lowest price of 12.5kg refilling LPG from January 2016 to April 2019 in the South West with a price of 2008.860 naira.
Conclusion: Naive produced lower MAPE for more states compared to NNETAR and ARIMA models.
Keywords: modelling, MAPE, artificial neural network, price, liquefied petroleum gas
1 INTRODUCTION
Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is one of the main energy sources for the majority of households in Nigeria. Data have shown that only 5% of the LPG utilization potential has been achieved[1]. While LPG is only used as a fundamental fuel, it is utilized as a beginning up/start fuel to help subsequent liquid filling activities or as an optional fuel elective for fuel oil. Nonetheless, the capacity of fuel oil is less complicated and is more competitive than LPG as optional fuel.
The delivery of gas has been bolstered following the dramatic and subjective cost reduction of the special interest in LPG in Nigeria, which provides opportunities for the industry, among which is the development of LPG in Nigeria.
Afimia[1], in estimating natural gas demand elasticity in Nigeria, used the bound testing approach to co-integration within the framework of ARDL to estimate annual time series data over a 33-year period (1984-2016) so as to investigate the responsiveness of natural gas demand to changes in natural gas price, income, and prices of other energy products.
The findings indicate that domestic gas price, automotive gas oil (AGO) price, international liquefied natural gas (LNG) price, and electricity consumption per capital are major predictors of Nigeria's natural gas demand and that natural gas demand elasticity in Nigeria is relatively price inelastic.
As a result, a decrease in natural gas prices will result in an increase in natural gas demand by less than the percentage fall in price and vice versa, ceteris paribus, which concludes that natural gas price is a major determinant of the quantity demanded of natural gas in Nigeria.
Gould and Urpelain[2] explored the incorporation of a clean cooking fuel into rural families' energy mixes using the 2014 to 2015 access survey with over 8500 households from six energy-poor Indian states. The findings of a large survey of LPG consumption in rural India, conducted using a descriptive analysis approach, found that LPG cost is a major barrier to widespread adoption, and that both users and non-users of LPG show extremely favourable views of LPG as convenient and clean cooking fuel. The research also revealed that increasing LPG use in rural India has significant potential, but that affordability precludes a complete switch from conventional biomass to clean cooking fuels.
The deep learning models have been applied to address various managerial problems such as sales forecasting, price elasticity modeling, brand analysis, new product acceptance research, and market segmentation and more[3,4]. According to Mensah et al.[5], energy prices, income, urbanization, and economic structure are significant demand drivers of the different energy types in Ghana, with varying estimated elasticity, according to disaggregated analysis in estimating energy demand in Ghana, which used key disaggregated energy components such as gasoline, diesel, LPG, kerosene, biomass, residual fuel oil, and electricity. It also demonstrated a significant level of inter-fuel substitution in Ghana's energy demand, especially from gasoline, diesel, and kerosene to LPG. Ogundunmade and Adepoju[6] emphasized the importance of artificial neural network (ANN) models in predictions using heterogeneous transfer functions. Ogundunmade et al.[7], also considered the prediction performance of machine learning models under two cross validation approaches, namely K-fold and repeated K-fold CVs and when no cross validation technique is used. The models incorporated the simple linear regression model, random forest, classification and regression tree, artificial neural network and the support vector machine model. Standard strategic indicators such as root mean square error and mean absolute error were used to evaluate the models. The financial data including real gross domestic product, inflation rate, exchange rate, and interest rate are used as the input units in the model. Yaya et al.[8] studied the relationship between natural gas prices and consumer prices, and its potential to deliver better indicators to analyze economic activity. The analysis of natural gas spot prices using fractional integration techniques in the setting of non-linear deterministic trends is the subject of this research. The daily and monthly series, as well as their logarithmic conversions, show non-stationarity with mean reverting coefficients. Only the monthly series shows evidence of non-linearity, which might be attributable to the increased degree of volatility associated with this frequency. Ogundunmade et al.[9] analyzed models among the machine-learning time series models to predict crude oil prices in Nigeria. The alternative models were the auto-regressive integrated moving average model, naive Bayes, Holtwinter trend model, exponential smoothing model, and neural network autoregressive (NNETAR) model. The prediction criteria adopted for model screening were the root mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The NNETAR model was recommended for the prediction of crude oil prices in Nigeria. In the present study, time series machine learning models were used to model the LPG price for 12.5kg refilling gas in Nigeria. The purpose of this study is to model the price of 12.5kg of LPG refilling in Nigerian states using machine learning time series models.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 Study Area and Data
Nigeria, a country in West Africa, is the largest country in Africa. It has distinguished demographic characteristics in Sub-Saharan Africa and shares a border in the North with Niger, at North East Chad, at East Cameroon and also Benin in the west region. Nigeria at 9.0820º N latitude, 8.6753º E longitude, is a tropical region at the extreme inner corner side of Guinea, which is on the west coast of Africa and covers an area of 923,768 square km and a coastline of 85km. The country is 1,045km long and 1,126km wide. Nigeria comprises 36 states and the country capital Abuja which has the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). Nigeria is divided into six geopolitical zones and has various ethnic groups and different cultures across the states and geopolitical zones.
Figure 1 shows the map of the 36 states of Nigeria including the FCT. Monthly panel data of 12.5kg of LPG prices for 36 states and Abuja in Nigeria are considered. This series span from January 2016 to April 2019 covering 1558 data points. The data were sourced from the Nigeria Data Portal. The states were divided into:
North Central-include Benue, Niger, Kogi, Kwara, Plateau, Nassarawa, and FCT.
North West-include Jigawa, Kano, Katsina, Kaduna, Kebbi, Zamfara, and Sokoto states.
North East-include Gombe, Bauchi, Yobe, Benue, Adamawa, Taraba states.
South-South-include Akwa-Ibom, Cross Rivers, Bayelsa, Rivers, Delta and Edo states.
South East-include Abia, Imo, Ebonyi, and Anambra states.
South West-include Ekiti, Ondo, Osun, Oyo, Ogun and Lagos.
Figure 1. Map of Nigeria showing the states. Source: Nigeria Data Portal.
2.2 NNETAR Model
The “nnetar” function in the package “caret” (R environment) was used to identify NNAR models. The NNAR models were marked as NNAR (p,k) for non-seasonal data, where p represents the number of non-seasonal lags used as inputs and k denotes the number of nodes/neurons in the hidden layer. The NNAR (p,k) process was similar to the AR process but with nonlinear functions. The Akaike's information criterion (AICc) metric was used to determine the ideal number of non-seasonal delays, and the optimal number of neurons was determined by calculating (p+P+1)/2, where p is the nonseasonal AR order and P is the seasonal AR order (if any). Finally, the MAPE metric was used to assess the goodness of fit.
2.3 Naive Forecasting Model
One of the most basic predicting approaches is the Naive Forecasting Model. The one-step-ahead forecast is equal to the most recent actual value, according to each:
The “Random Walk” statistical model that underpins Naive is written as:
is the price of the refilling LPG of the current year while representing the prices of the 12.5kg refilling LPG for the previous year and represents random error which is assumed to be stochastic.
2.4 Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) Model
ARIMA models were recognized using the "auto.arima" function, which was developed by Hyndman and Khandakar (2008) and was included in the package “forecast” (in R environment). The number of p parameters of the autoregressive (AR) process, the order I of differencing (I), and the number of q parameters of the moving average process were all used in this function to find the best ARIMA models (MA). It incorporated unit root tests, as well as the reduction of the bias, corrected AICc and maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) methods. The unit root tests were available to determine the order of differencing, while the AICc and MLE methods could be used to determine the AR and MA processes' optimal parameters.
2.5 Model Performance Measures
To assess the ANN performance of these models, conventional measurements such as MAPE were employed. In the present study, the goodness of fit measure, namely, MAPE was utilized to assess the performances of all models.
MAPE is a measure of how accurate a forecast is. It measures accuracy as a percentage.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This presents the analysis of the modelling of the price of 12.5kg refilling LPG in Nigeria. The data obtained from the Nigeria data portal spanned from January 2016 to April 2019. The zones in Nigeria included for analysis were North East North Central, North West, South South, South East and South West.
3.1 Descriptive Statistics
The summary of the data is displayed below in terms of the minimum (min), maximum (max), mean, standard deviation (SD) and median (med) values of the 12.5kg refilling prices of LPG in Nigerian states. Tables 1-6 show the descriptive statistics of the price of 12.5kg of refilling LPG for North East, North Central, North West, South South, South East and South West respectively.
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics of the 12.5kg Refilling Prices of LPG for North East
North East |
||||
Min |
Max |
Mean±SD |
Med |
|
Gombe |
1700 |
2650 |
2145.293±854078 |
2136.76 |
Bauchi |
1850 |
2550 |
2253.650±238.1346 |
2308.175 |
Yobe |
1843.8 |
2700 |
2243.021±246.2442 |
2300.997 |
Adamawa |
1720 |
2700 |
2126.879±267.6890 |
2108.333 |
Taraba |
1850 |
2580 |
2163.504±201.5800 |
2151.5 |
Borno |
1800 |
2825 |
2287.875±252.6571 |
2362.5 |
Table 2. Descriptive Statistics of the 12.5kg Refilling Prices of LPG for North Central
North Central |
||||
State |
Min |
Max |
Mean±SD |
Med |
Benue |
1800 |
2740 |
2183.289±238.1493 |
2200 |
Niger |
1800 |
2800 |
2102.836±228.0681 |
2007.143 |
Kogi |
1803.13 |
2650 |
2071.667±226.8594 |
2000 |
Kwara |
1816.67 |
2800 |
2090.430±246.1266 |
2000 |
Plateau |
1800 |
2820 |
2110.039±229.2054 |
2084.444 |
Nassarawa |
1814.88 |
2860 |
2105.772±241.8497 |
2077.451 |
Fct |
1730 |
2800 |
2003.056±271.2168 |
1900 |
Table 3. Descriptive Statistics of the 12.5kg Refilling Prices of LPG for North West
North West |
||||
State |
Min |
Max |
Mean±SD |
Med |
Jigawa |
1775 |
2500 |
2060.193±206.8024 |
1977.017 |
Kano |
1750 |
2750 |
2097.443±229.4912 |
2070.833 |
Katsina |
1757.143 |
2572.222 |
2089.130±219.8488 |
2023.185 |
Kaduna |
1687.5 |
2566.667 |
2006.436±248.6832 |
1933.333 |
Kebbi |
1850 |
3000 |
2130.074±237.3954 |
2050.165 |
Zamfara |
1700 |
3000 |
2113.924±268.4952 |
2038.75 |
Sokoto |
1800 |
2575 |
2058.047±195.5089 |
2000.447 |
Table 4. Descriptive Statistics of the 12.5kg Refilling Prices of LPG for South-South
South-South |
||||
State |
Min |
Max |
Mean±SD |
Med |
Akwa-Ibom |
1705.65 |
3000 |
2167.797±253.1529 |
2181.335 |
Cross Rivers |
1800 |
3000 |
2156.812±260.7478 |
2122.917 |
Bayelsa |
1800 |
3000 |
2131.340±250.5978 |
2061.111 |
Rivers |
1800 |
3000 |
2157.388±260.9368 |
2121.023 |
Delta |
1771.429 |
2984.615 |
2121.364±277.2808 |
2094.712 |
Edo |
1700 |
3030.769 |
2092.955±285.1201 |
2072.5 |
Table 5. Descriptive Statistics of the 12.5kg Refilling Prices of LPG for North Central
South East |
||||
State |
Min |
Max |
Mean±SD |
Med |
Abia |
1657.14 |
3000 |
2089.043±276.9539 |
2112.5 |
Imo |
1750 |
2700 |
2084.864±246.2536 |
1998.875 |
Ebonyi |
1690 |
2880.34 |
2033.262±292.4602 |
1913.333 |
Anambra |
1666.67 |
2800 |
2218.837±250.7015 |
2245.113 |
Enugu |
1672.222 |
2944.444 |
2047.211±302.4435 |
2000 |
Table 6. Descriptive Statistics of the 12.5kg Refilling Prices of LPG for South West
South West |
||||
State |
Min |
Max |
Mean±SD |
Med |
Ekiti |
1745.455 |
2580 |
2008.860±221.1862 |
1956.667 |
Ondo |
1731.25 |
2600 |
2091.869±192.0355 |
2093.18 |
Osun |
1703.571 |
2616.66 |
2091.675±220.5871 |
2045.536 |
Oyo |
1753.684 |
2700 |
2067.757±254.3063 |
2000 |
Ogun |
1700 |
2555.556 |
2063.711±231.9369 |
2058.723 |
Lagos |
1813.89 |
2650 |
2066.9430±224.896 |
1977.273 |
Table 1 shows the descriptive statistics for North East. It shows that Gombe has a mean and standard deviation of 2145.293 and 2854078, Bauchi has 2253.650 and 238.1346, Yobe has 2243.021 and 246.2442, Adamawa has 2126.879 and 267.6890, Taraba has 2163.504 and 201.5800 and Borno has 2287.875 and 252.6571 respectively. On average, Adamawa has the lowest price of 12.5kg refilling LPG from January 2016 to April 2019 in the North East with a price of 2126.879 naira. Table 2 shows the descriptive statistics for North Central. It shows that Benue has a mean and standard deviation of 2183.289 and 238.1493, Niger has 2102.836 and 228.0681, Kogi has 2071.667 and 226.8594, Kwara has 2090.430 and 246.1266, Plateau has 2110.039 and 229.2054, Nasarawa has 2105.772 and 241.8497 and FCT has 2003.056 and 271.2168 respectively. On average, FCT has the lowest price of 12.5kg refilling LPG from January 2016 to April 2019 in the North Central with a price of 2003.056 naira. Table 3 shows the descriptive statistics for North West. It shows that Jigawa has a mean and standard deviation of 2060.193 and 206.8024, Kano has 2097.443 and 229.4912, Kastina has 2089.130 and 219.8488, Kaduna has 2006.436 and 248.6832, Kebbi has 2130.074 and 237.3954, Zamfara has 2113.924 and 268.4952 and Sokoto has 2058.047 and 195.5089 respectively. On average, Kaduna has the lowest price of 12.5kg refilling LPG from January 2016 to April 2019 in the North West with a price of 2006.436 naira. Table 4 shows the descriptive statistics for the South South. It shows that Akwa-Ibom has a mean and standard deviation of 2167.797 and 253.1529, Cross Rivers has 2156.812 and 260.7478, Bayelsa has 2131.340 and 250.5978, Rivers has 2157.388 and 260.9368, Delta has 2121.364 and 277.2808 and Edo has 2092.955 and 285.1201 respectively. On average, Edo has the lowest price of 12.5kg refilling LPG from January 2016 to April 2019 in the South South with a price of 2092.955 naira. Table 5 shows the descriptive statistics for the South East. It shows that Abia has a mean and standard deviation of 2089.043 and 276.9539, Imo has 2084.864 and 246.2536, Ebonyi has 2033.262 and 292.4602, Anambra has 2218.837 and 250.7015 and Enugu has 2047.211 and 302.4435 respectively. On the average, Ebonyi has the lowest price of 12.5kg refilling LPG from January 2016 to April 2019 in the South East with a price of 2033.262 naira. Table 6 shows the descriptive statistics for the South West. It shows that Ekiti has a mean and standard deviation of 2008.860 and 221.1862, Ondo has 2091.869 and 192.0355, Osun has 2091.675 and 220.5871, Oyo has 2067.757 and 254.3063, Ogun has 2063.711 and 231.9369 and Lagos has 2066.9430 and 224.896 respectively. On average, Ekiti has the lowest price of 12.5kg refilling LPG from January 2016 to April 2019 in the South west with a price of 2008.860 naira.
Figure 2 shows the plot of the prices of 12.5kg refilling LPG in the 37 states in Nigeria, and possible co-movement is observed, with longer spikes on many occasions implying points of high prices.
Figure 2. Line plot of 12.5kg refilling price of LPG in 37 states in Nigeria.
3.2 Model Estimation
In this section, the data were modeled using the considered time series machine learning models, i.e. ARIMA, naive Bayes and the neural network auto-regressive models. The result for each model is given in Table 7.
Table 7. Model Estimation
State |
ARIMA Model AIC |
Naive (Residual s.d) |
NNETAR |
Abia |
ARIMA (0,1,1) 454.37 |
361.9403 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Abuja |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 463.8 |
368.9542 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Adamawa |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 483.07 |
469.6651 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Akwa Ibom |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 483.44 |
493.4473 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Anambra |
ARIMA (0,1,0) 460.23 |
469.1738 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Bauchi |
ARIMA (0,0,1) 468.98 |
465.6608 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Bayelsa |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 463.52 |
346.2418 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Benue |
ARIMA (0,1,0) 472.01 |
419.9018 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Borno |
ARIMA (0,0,1) 481.25 |
533.8451 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Cross River |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 484.47 |
522.6915 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Delta |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 481.94 |
520.946 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Ebonyi |
ARIMA (0,0,1) 479.66 |
499.6535 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Edo |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 481.35 |
390.7121 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Ekiti |
ARIMA (0,0,1) 471.94 |
415.274 |
NNAR (2,2) 2-2-1 |
Enugu |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 472.35 |
366.3566 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Gombe |
ARIMA (0,1,0) 471.25 |
602.5744 |
NNAR (2,2) 2-2-1 |
Imo |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 478.06 |
424.2197 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Jigawa |
ARIMA (1,1,0) 454.54 |
472.5319 |
NNAR (5,3) 5-3-1 |
Kaduna |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 472.11 |
379.8261 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Kano |
ARIMA (2,0,0) 469.98 |
371.3084 |
NNAR (2,2) 2-2-1 |
Katsina |
ARIMA (0,1,1) 450.17 |
516.4989 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Kebbi |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 493.1 |
591.1371 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Kogi |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 461.74 |
315.4195 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Kwara |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 483.83 |
554.797 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Lagos |
ARIMA (0,0,1) 484.9 |
442.1647 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Nasarawa |
ARIMA (0,1,0) 462.42 |
432.8119 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Niger |
ARIMA (0,0,1) 486.03 |
522.2372 |
NNAR (3,2) 3-2-1 |
Ogun |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 457.45 |
313.9312 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Ondo |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 492.35 |
399.5036 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Osun |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 461.63 |
362.9345 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Oyo |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 484.97 |
533.4016 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Plateau |
ARIMA (0,1,1) 450.77 |
553.5682 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Rivers |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 471.95 |
462.582 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Sokoto |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 487.45 |
514.229 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Taraba |
ARIMA (0,0,1) 488.61 |
541.1193 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Yobe |
ARIMA (0,0,1) 478.57 |
546.9955 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Zamfara |
ARIMA (1,0,0) 478.87 |
416.2259 |
NNAR (1,1) 1-1-1 |
Table 7 shows the results of the model estimation for ARIMA, naive Bayes and the NNETAR models. The result for ARIMA is in the first column showing the value for p, d and q respectively. The ARIMA result for Abia state shows ARIMA (0,1,1) with the min AIC value of 454.37. ARIMA (0,1,1) implies that the data of LPG price of 12.5kg refilling follows the moving average of order 1 with a difference of 1. The same implies to the other 36 states considered. Column 2 in Table 7 produced the residual SD for the data of each state. Column 3 shows the neural network model order of the LPG price for each state. 32 out of 37 states follow NNAR (1,1) which implies one input and one output. States like Ekiti, Gombe and Kano follow NNAR (2,2) each. While Jigawa and Niger follow NNAR (5,3) and NNAR (3,2) respectively.
3.3 Forecast Measures for the Models
Table 8 shows the MAPE results for the models used for the price of 12.5kg of refilling LPG in 37 states of Nigeria. The coloured values marked in the tables are the least MAPE values produced for each state. NNETAR and ARIMA best predict the price of 12.5kg refilling LGP for 12 and 11 states respectively while naive predicts for 14 states.
Table 8. Forecast Measures for the Models Using MAPE
State |
ARIMA |
Naive |
NNETAR |
Abia |
0.3984873 |
0.3984873 |
0.01242292 |
Abuja |
0.03152774 |
0.19276 |
0.06222852 |
Adamawa |
0.3244903 |
0.5741522 |
0.07843926 |
Akwa Ibom |
0.3229858 |
0.2305255 |
0.2296724 |
Anambra |
0.2659146 |
0.4064739 |
0.6248645 |
Bauchi |
1.354522 |
1.854664 |
1.522133 |
Bayelsa |
0.3770372 |
0.5410757 |
0.4711242 |
Benue |
0.4946475 |
0.3919953 |
0.6060867 |
Borno |
0.2224315 |
0.04651095 |
0.05739366 |
Cross River |
0.4342346 |
0.8379205 |
0.4317453 |
Delta |
0.07834129 |
0.3710712 |
0.1998949 |
Ebonyi |
0.2359589 |
0.001648152 |
0.1553445 |
Edo |
0.3989752 |
0.1298232 |
0.3851524 |
Ekiti |
0.2927878 |
0.07778386 |
0.3971776 |
Enugu |
0.3138865 |
0.04509449 |
0.1952926 |
Gombe |
0.3227813 |
0.5397284 |
0.04946849 |
Imo |
0.1506556 |
0.2236358 |
0.4041998 |
Jigawa |
0.2972069 |
0.4076087 |
0.3352684 |
Kaduna |
0.5438156 |
0.5438156 |
0.3424322 |
Kano |
0.01648947 |
0.4983143 |
0.2404467 |
Katsina |
0.1323356 |
0.1504144 |
0.00542202 |
Kebbi |
0.1680548 |
0.1173754 |
0.1493791 |
Kogi |
0.1878467 |
0.134234 |
0.4363876 |
Kwara |
0.5020068 |
0.2578385 |
0.7497674 |
Lagos |
0.1273739 |
0.02536944 |
0.4018972 |
Nasarawa |
0.2845860 |
0.2845861 |
0.04729451 |
Niger |
0.05939995 |
0.4034468 |
0.4690108 |
Ogun |
0.1354385 |
0.2713824 |
0.001506067 |
Ondo |
0.4401882 |
0.3995298 |
0.1362453 |
Osun |
0.1412026 |
0.2214668 |
0.08729425 |
Oyo |
0.2024877 |
0.1955366 |
0.7445525 |
Plateau |
0.03584741 |
0.2297746 |
0.005409473 |
Rivers |
0.09964443 |
0.07063571 |
0.1906414 |
Sokoto |
0.3687059 |
0.2089954 |
0.4322136 |
Taraba |
0.1562326 |
0.07520401 |
0.2184252 |
Yobe |
0.3877903 |
0.3638269 |
0.5743241 |
Zamfara |
0.7021517 |
0.8626734 |
0.8146726 |
4 CONCLUSION
The present study modeled the price of 12.5kg of refilling LPG for 37 states in Nigeria for the data spanning from January 2016 to April 2019. The artificial neural network model was employed given its ability to capture both the linearity and the non-linearity part of the data. The results suggested that Adamawa has the lowest price of 12.5kg refilling LPG from January 2016 to April 2019 in the North East with a price of 2126.879 naira, FCT has the lowest price of 12.5kg refilling LPG from January 2016 to April 2019 in the North Central with a price of 2003.056 naira, Kaduna has the lowest price of 12.5kg refilling LPG from January 2016 to April 2019 in the North West with a price of 2006.436 naira, Edo has the lowest price of 12.5kg refilling LPG from January 2016 to April 2019 in the South South with a price of 2092.955 naira, Ebonyi has the lowest price of 12.5kg refilling LPG from January 2016 to April 2019 in the South East with a price of 2033.262 naira and Ekiti has the lowest price of 12.5kg refilling LPG from January 2016 to April 2019 in the South west with a price of 2008.860 naira.
With reference to the result of the MAPE, the naive models produced lower MAPE values for most states compared to the NNETAR and ARIMA models, implying that the naive model produces valuable predictions of the price of 12.5kg refilling LPG for most states in Nigeria.
Acknowledgments
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Author Contribution
Ogundunmade TP designed the study and wrote the article. Adepoju AA revised the paper for intellectual contribution. Both authors approved the final version.
Abbreviation List
AGO, Automotive gas oil
AICc, Akaike's information criterion
ANN, Artificial neural network
AR, Autoregressive
ARIMA, Autoregressive integrated moving average
FCT, Federal Capital Territory
LNG, Liquefied natural gas
LPG, Liquefied petroleum gas
MAPE, mean absolute percentage error
max, Maximum
Med, Median
min, Minimum
MLE, Maximum likelihood estimation
NNETAR, Neural network autoregressive
SD, Standard deviation
[1] Afimia EO. Estimating natural gas demand elasticities in Nigeria. J Energy Research Rev, 2019; 12. DOI: 10.9734/JENRR/2019/v2i430084
[2] Gould CF, Urpelainen J. LPG as a clean cooking fuel: Adoption, use, and impact in rural India. Energ Policy, 2018; 122: 395-408. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.042
[3] Hakimpoor H, Tat HH, Khani N et al. Marketing networking dimensions (Mnds) and SMEs performance, A new conceptual model. Aust J Basic Applied Sciences, 2011; 5: 1528-1533.
[4] Ogundunmade TP, Adepoju AA. On heterogenous transfer functions in bayesian neural network: Paper presented at the Virtual Paper Session-16th Brazilian Meeting of Bayesian Statistics and VI Latin American Conference on Statistical Computing, March, 2022.
[5] Mensah JT, Marbuah G, Amoah A. Energy demand in Ghana: A disaggregated analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 2016; 53: 924-935. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.035
[6] Ogundunmade TP, Adepoju AA. The performance of artificial neural network using heterogeneous transfer functions. Int J Data Sci Anal, 2021; 2: 92-103. DOI: 10.18517/ijods.2.2.92-103.2021
[7] Ogundunmade TP, Adepoju AA, Allam A. Stock price forecasting: Machine learning models with K-fold and repeated cross validation approaches. Mod Econ Manag, 2022; 1: 1. DOI: 10.53964/mem.2022001
[8] Yaya OOS, Abu N, Ogundunmade TP. Economic policy uncertainty in G7 countries: Evidence of long-range dependence and cointegration. Econ Chang Restruct, 2021; 54: 541-556. DOI: 10.1007/s10644-020-09288-3
[9] Ogundunmade TP, Adepoju AA, Allam A. Predicting crude oil price in Nigeria with machine learning models. Mod Econ Manag, 2022; 1: 4. DOI: 10.53964/mem.2022004
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). This open-access article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.